PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZF vs. HYGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NZF vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZF achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, NZF has underperformed HYGH with an annualized return of 3.16%, while HYGH has yielded a comparatively higher 6.28% annualized return.


NZF

1D
-0.73%
1M
-2.79%
6M
1.93%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
-1.05%
10Y*
3.16%
ALL TIME*
5.28%

HYGH

1D
0.23%
1M
0.18%
6M
3.04%
YTD
3.69%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
6.28%
ALL TIME*
4.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.51M$5.45M$4.91M
$6.09M$6.45M$6.65M

NZF vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
1.35%11.78%10.09%2.49%-25.53%11.19%3.58%28.33%-6.79%14.48%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
3.69%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%0.54%11.09%-0.85%6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NZF and HYGH is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2014

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NZF vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NZF
NZF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
NZF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NZF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NZF vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NZFHYGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

4.24

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

16.68

-10.33

NZF vs. HYGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the HYGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZF and HYGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NZF vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZF drawdown since its inception was -48.55%, which is greater than HYGH's maximum drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZF and HYGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NZFHYGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.55%

-23.88%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-1.62%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

-8.06%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.42%

-8.24%

-29.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.42%

-23.88%

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-0.06%

-5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-2.20%

-5.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.41%

+1.56%

Volatility

NZF vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) at 0.63%. This indicates that NZF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NZFHYGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

0.63%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

2.77%

+5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

3.64%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.39%

7.06%

+5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.09%

8.21%

+4.88%

NZF vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZF has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGH's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

NZF vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison

NZF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than HYGH's 6.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.56%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.82%7.58%6.84%4.51%5.80%4.63%4.74%4.82%6.05%5.86%6.26%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NZF and HYGH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NZF has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to HYGH (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZF dropped -48.55% vs HYGH's -23.88%.

HYGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NZF and HYGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer