NYSX vs. ILCG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - NYSX tracks the NYSE 100 Index while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.

Performance

NYSX vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NYSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILCG

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 2.03%
• 6M: 10.64%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 1Y: 20.33%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 12.62%
• 10Y*: 17.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYSX vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	31.20%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NYSX and ILCG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.96

Return for Risk

NYSX vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYSX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 35
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYSX vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NYSX	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.11	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.29	—

Drawdowns

NYSX vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and ILCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NYSX	ILCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-52.98%	+44.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-3.00%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-8.20%	+6.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NYSX	ILCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.97%	17.97%	+9.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	22.27%	+4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.97%	21.63%	+5.34%

NYSX vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NYSX vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

NYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than ILCG's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.41%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NYSX and ILCG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, NYSX and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, NYSX or ILCG?

On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NYSX or ILCG?

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for NYSX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NYSX or ILCG?

ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.05% for NYSX.

What is the main difference between NYSX and ILCG?

NYSX tracks NYSE 100 Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.04% for ILCG.