NYSX vs. GRW
NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NYSX is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.
Performance
NYSX vs. GRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NYSX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 11.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRW
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NYSX vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF | 1.88% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYSX and GRW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYSX vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYSX | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 17.95 | 13.58 | +4.37 |
Drawdowns
NYSX vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -3.46%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and GRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYSX | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -0.45% | -3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -0.27% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.17% | -0.35% |
Volatility
NYSX vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYSX | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.44% | 8.89% | +12.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 8.89% | +12.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 8.89% | +12.55% |
NYSX vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYSX vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison
Neither NYSX nor GRW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NYSX and GRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYSX is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYSX is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
NYSX and GRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.75% for GRW.
Find the right allocation for NYSX and GRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer