NYM vs. FTHI
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and FTHI (First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FTHI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FTHI.
Performance
NYM vs. FTHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than FTHI's 4.88% return.
NYM
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTHI
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
NYM vs. FTHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.55% | 0.47% |
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 4.88% | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and FTHI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. FTHI — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTHI
NYM vs. FTHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYM | FTHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYM vs. FTHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum FTHI drawdown of -32.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and FTHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | FTHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -32.65% | +30.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.71% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -3.67% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.28% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. FTHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | FTHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 9.08% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 13.43% | -11.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 14.29% | -12.26% |
NYM vs. FTHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. FTHI - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than FTHI's 8.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF | 8.72% | 8.70% | 8.61% | 8.50% | 9.06% | 4.37% | 4.76% | 4.21% | 4.76% | 4.00% | 4.41% | 4.98% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and FTHI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FTHI.
FTHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.72%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FTHI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.85% for FTHI.
Find the right allocation for NYM and FTHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer