NYM vs. ERX
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while ERX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). NYM is actively managed, while ERX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
NYM vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 42.50% return.
NYM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- 42.50%
- 6M
- 44.57%
- 1Y
- 57.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 24.74%
- 10Y*
- -9.47%
NYM vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.68% | 0.47% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 42.50% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and ERX is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ERX
NYM vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYM vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -99.54% | +97.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -92.81% | +92.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -67.10% | +66.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.06% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02% | 41.76% | -39.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.02% | 51.94% | -49.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.02% | 69.06% | -67.04% |
NYM vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than ERX's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.79% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and ERX have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 1.09% for ERX.
Find the right allocation for NYM and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer