NYM vs. EINC
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. NYM is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
NYM vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.51% return.
NYM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 25.51%
- 6M
- 23.55%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 29.36%
- 5Y*
- 20.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
NYM vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.37% | 0.41% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.51% | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and EINC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
EINC
NYM vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 0.04 | +1.52 |
Drawdowns
NYM vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -87.55% | +85.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -4.85% | +4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -44.27% | +43.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05% | 14.70% | -12.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.05% | 19.57% | -17.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.05% | 25.43% | -23.38% |
NYM vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than EINC's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.53% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and EINC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for NYM and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer