NXUS vs. NUDV
NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and NUDV (Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXUS is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NUDV.
Performance
NXUS vs. NUDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than NUDV's 12.61% return.
NXUS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUDV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 20.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXUS vs. NUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.54% | 0.45% |
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF | 12.61% | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXUS and NUDV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXUS vs. NUDV — Risk / Return Rank
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUDV
NXUS vs. NUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NXUS | NUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NXUS vs. NUDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum NUDV drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and NUDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXUS | NUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -20.10% | +17.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.48% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -4.81% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
NXUS vs. NUDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXUS | NUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 10.34% | -6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 14.87% | -11.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 14.87% | -11.17% |
NXUS vs. NUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUDV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NXUS vs. NUDV - Dividend Comparison
NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than NUDV's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF | 2.28% | 2.36% | 6.18% | 2.48% | 2.96% | 0.60% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.95% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXUS and NUDV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NUDV.
NUDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.95% for NXUS.
NXUS is categorized as Global Bonds, while NUDV is Large Cap Value Equities. NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.26% for NUDV.
Find the right allocation for NXUS and NUDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer