NXTG vs. FYLD
NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXTG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. NXTG is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, NXTG returned 17.48%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for FYLD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NXTG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
NXTG vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXTG achieves a 44.90% return, which is significantly higher than FYLD's 19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NXTG has outperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 17.48%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.
NXTG
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 44.90%
- 6M
- 46.42%
- 1Y
- 67.34%
- 3Y*
- 31.56%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.48%
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
NXTG vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 44.90% | 28.46% | 12.85% | 28.74% | -24.70% | 21.81% | 27.58% | 29.58% | -17.25% | 28.02% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXTG and FYLD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.62 |
The correlation between NXTG and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NXTG vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NXTG
FYLD
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
NXTG
FYLD
Communication Services
NXTG
FYLD
Real Estate
NXTG
FYLD
-
Industrials
NXTG
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
NXTG
FYLD
Basic Materials
NXTG
-
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
NXTG
-
FYLD
Energy
NXTG
-
FYLD
Financial Services
NXTG
-
FYLD
Healthcare
NXTG
-
FYLD
-
Utilities
NXTG
-
FYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXTG vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
NXTG
FYLD
NXTG vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NXTG | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.58 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 7.11 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.94 | 25.06 | -2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NXTG vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXTG | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -44.55% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -5.44% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -15.15% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.61% | -25.12% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -44.55% | +10.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.01% | -0.33% | -6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -8.81% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.54% | +1.41% |
Volatility
NXTG vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 3.71%. This indicates that NXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXTG | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.94% | 3.71% | +8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.01% | 9.21% | +8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.65% | 11.82% | +8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 16.27% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 18.01% | +1.07% |
NXTG vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
NXTG vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FYLD's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXTG and FYLD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXTG has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTG dropped -33.61% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 10-year performance, NXTG leads with 17.48% vs 12.08% for FYLD. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.18% for NXTG.
NXTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while FYLD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG and 0.59% for FYLD.
NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NXTG and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer