PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXP vs. PZT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXP vs. PZT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NXP having a 3.36% return and PZT slightly higher at 3.37%. Over the past 10 years, NXP has outperformed PZT with an annualized return of 3.16%, while PZT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.


NXP

1D
0.00%
1M
1.37%
YTD
3.36%
6M
3.14%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
3.16%

PZT

1D
0.34%
1M
2.47%
YTD
3.37%
6M
3.21%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXP vs. PZT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
3.36%-2.73%6.83%10.68%-9.51%-7.36%12.12%20.94%0.04%9.30%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.37%1.76%1.17%7.57%-13.04%2.67%5.89%9.52%-0.55%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NXP and PZT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007

0.18

The correlation between NXP and PZT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXP vs. PZT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXP
NXP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXP Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PZT
PZT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PZT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PZT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXP vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXPPZTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.80

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

9.51

-4.33

NXP vs. PZT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXP Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the PZT Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXP and PZT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXP vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXP drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, which is greater than PZT's maximum drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXP and PZT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXPPZTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.64%

-22.73%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.37%

-3.17%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.68%

-9.00%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.64%

-19.13%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.64%

-19.13%

-8.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.69%

-0.94%

-5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-3.90%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.93%

+0.42%

Volatility

NXP vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) at 1.39%. This indicates that NXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXPPZTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

1.39%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

3.52%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.51%

4.70%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.71%

6.64%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.08%

6.93%

+5.15%

Dividends

NXP vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison

NXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than PZT's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
4.48%4.47%4.00%3.94%3.93%3.42%3.07%3.33%3.88%3.79%3.96%3.99%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.60%3.43%3.04%2.82%2.66%2.77%2.55%2.73%3.01%2.94%3.36%3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXP and PZT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXP has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to PZT (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXP dropped -27.64% vs PZT's -22.73%.

PZT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXP and PZT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer