NWZNX vs. NWHVX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NWZNX (Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund) and NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NWZNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while NWHVX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 5 years, NWZNX returned 11.10%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for NWHVX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.07% expense ratio.

Performance

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund (NWZNX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWZNX achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -3.46% return.

NWZNX

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 11.50%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —

NWHVX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: -3.46%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: -8.76%
• 3Y*: 5.85%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NWZNX Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund	1.40%	13.28%	32.96%	44.70%	-27.67%	16.89%	30.82%	30.51%	-2.95%	12.69%
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	-3.46%	-2.38%	9.89%	23.84%	-28.32%	25.03%	31.17%	29.96%	-2.97%	9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NWZNX and NWHVX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2017	0.82

The correlation between NWZNX and NWHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NWZNX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWZNX

NWZNX Risk / Return Rank: 9
NWZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
NWZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
NWZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
NWZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NWZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

NWHVX

NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund (NWZNX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NWZNX	NWHVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	-0.58	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	-0.74	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.92	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	-0.47	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.59	-1.06	+2.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWZNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the NWHVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWZNX and NWHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWZNX	NWHVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	-0.58	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.07	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.44	+0.24

Drawdowns

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWZNX drawdown since its inception was -36.41%, roughly equal to the maximum NWHVX drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWZNX and NWHVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWZNX	NWHVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.41%	-37.12%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.85%	-17.82%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.01%	-19.80%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.41%	-37.12%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-12.61%	+7.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.24%	-7.83%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.48%	7.95%	-0.47%

Volatility

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund (NWZNX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) at 3.97%. This indicates that NWZNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWZNX	NWHVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	3.97%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	11.38%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.23%	14.46%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.50%	19.87%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	19.68%	+2.12%

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NWZNX and NWHVX have an expense ratio of 1.07%.

Dividends

NWZNX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison

NWZNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, more than NWHVX's 8.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.25%	7.96%	11.93%	16.14%	36.45%	34.64%	6.16%	18.85%	38.53%	11.37%	8.97%	13.54%
NWZNX Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund	8.51%	8.63%	9.42%	7.12%	8.43%	10.57%	2.57%	1.35%	8.44%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWZNX and NWHVX in my portfolio?

NWZNX and NWHVX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWZNX or NWHVX?

NWZNX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to NWHVX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWZNX dropped -36.41% vs NWHVX's -37.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NWZNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.