PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWQIX vs. HBFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) and Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWQIX achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than HBFBX's 6.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NWQIX having a 5.75% annualized return and HBFBX not far ahead at 6.02%.


NWQIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.11%
YTD
5.50%
6M
5.80%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
5.75%

HBFBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.98%
YTD
6.21%
6M
5.96%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
6.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.50%11.74%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%9.18%
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
6.21%9.90%4.81%7.62%3.83%8.07%-2.98%9.71%0.06%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NWQIX and HBFBX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.51

The correlation between NWQIX and HBFBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWQIX vs. HBFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HBFBX
HBFBX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HBFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HBFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) and Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWQIXHBFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.41

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

3.88

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.43

9.80

+12.63

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWQIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the HBFBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWQIX and HBFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWQIX drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum HBFBX drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWQIX and HBFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWQIXHBFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.89%

-41.61%

+17.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-3.20%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.59%

-6.10%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

-10.22%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.89%

-17.24%

-6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.89%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-4.05%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

1.26%

-0.64%

Volatility

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) is 1.25%, while Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that NWQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWQIXHBFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.87%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

4.14%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

5.64%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

7.21%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

8.13%

-1.82%

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWQIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HBFBX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWQIX vs. HBFBX - Dividend Comparison

NWQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than HBFBX's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
1.76%1.90%5.40%4.62%9.50%3.79%0.95%5.20%5.51%7.62%7.76%2.53%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.50%6.09%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWQIX and HBFBX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBFBX has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to NWQIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWQIX dropped -23.89% vs HBFBX's -41.61%.

NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWQIX and HBFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer