NWKDX vs. CMCIX
NWKDX (Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, NWKDX returned -3.29% vs 0.03% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWKDX charges 0.94%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
NWKDX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWKDX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 2.70% return.
NWKDX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- -3.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 0.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NWKDX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NWKDX Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.34% | -8.35% | 13.47% | 8.70% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.70% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWKDX and CMCIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between NWKDX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWKDX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
NWKDX
CMCIX
NWKDX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Growth Fund (NWKDX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWKDX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.01 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | -0.02 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | -0.05 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWKDX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | -0.02 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.34 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
NWKDX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWKDX drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWKDX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWKDX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -21.50% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -11.68% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.07% | -9.93% | -5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -6.45% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 4.99% | +0.06% |
Volatility
NWKDX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Growth Fund (NWKDX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.71%. This indicates that NWKDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWKDX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 3.71% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 10.57% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 15.15% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 16.53% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 16.53% | +4.64% |
NWKDX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWKDX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWKDX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
NWKDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NWKDX Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Growth Fund | 2.59% | 2.62% | 3.31% | 0.71% | 1.80% | 8.46% | 0.45% | 2.12% | 6.11% | 4.65% | 0.16% | 5.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWKDX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NWKDX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to CMCIX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWKDX dropped -34.81% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWKDX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer