PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWHVX vs. VSNGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -2.62% return, which is significantly lower than VSNGX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX has underperformed VSNGX with an annualized return of 8.89%, while VSNGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.


NWHVX

1D
1.07%
1M
2.16%
YTD
-2.62%
6M
-3.14%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.89%

VSNGX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.20%
YTD
6.63%
6M
6.84%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
-2.62%-2.38%9.89%23.84%-28.32%25.03%31.17%29.96%-2.97%23.11%
VSNGX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.63%6.09%18.60%16.15%-16.03%19.97%22.62%32.73%-8.20%21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHVX and VSNGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013

0.91

The correlation between NWHVX and VSNGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWHVX vs. VSNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHVX
NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VSNGX
VSNGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VSNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VSNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWHVXVSNGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

1.12

-1.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.57

1.70

-2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.20

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

1.71

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

6.38

-7.21

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the VSNGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHVX and VSNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWHVXVSNGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

1.12

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.39

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.53

-0.08

Drawdowns

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum VSNGX drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and VSNGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWHVXVSNGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.12%

-54.50%

+17.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.82%

-8.24%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-18.96%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.12%

-25.08%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

-38.33%

+1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

-0.04%

-11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-7.43%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.90%

2.20%

+5.70%

Volatility

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX) at 2.80%. This indicates that NWHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSNGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWHVXVSNGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

2.80%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

9.16%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

12.40%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

17.40%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

19.59%

+0.09%

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VSNGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWHVX vs. VSNGX - Dividend Comparison

NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than VSNGX's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.18%7.96%11.93%16.14%36.45%34.64%6.16%18.85%38.53%11.37%8.97%13.54%
VSNGX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund
5.77%6.15%8.60%0.50%2.81%7.63%11.65%8.60%12.95%5.79%3.37%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWHVX and VSNGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWHVX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to VSNGX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHVX dropped -37.12% vs VSNGX's -54.50%.

VSNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWHVX and VSNGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer