NWHVX vs. GMXAX
NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) and GMXAX (Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund) are both mutual funds - NWHVX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while GMXAX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX returned 8.79%/yr vs 9.13%/yr for GMXAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWHVX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GMXAX.
Performance
NWHVX vs. GMXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than GMXAX's 14.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NWHVX having a 8.79% annualized return and GMXAX not far ahead at 9.13%.
NWHVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 1Y
- -7.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
GMXAX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
NWHVX vs. GMXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.15% | -2.38% | 9.89% | 23.84% | -28.32% | 25.03% | 31.17% | 29.96% | -2.97% | 23.11% |
GMXAX Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund | 14.21% | 6.84% | 12.15% | 15.89% | -13.45% | 24.33% | 12.79% | 25.35% | -10.65% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHVX and GMXAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013 | 0.86 |
The correlation between NWHVX and GMXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWHVX vs. GMXAX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHVX
GMXAX
NWHVX vs. GMXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWHVX | GMXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.22 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 2.22 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 7.98 | -8.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWHVX vs. GMXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum GMXAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and GMXAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHVX | GMXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.12% | -55.64% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.82% | -8.83% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -24.21% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.12% | -24.21% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.12% | -42.22% | +5.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.43% | -2.40% | -9.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -8.03% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.60% | 2.45% | +6.15% |
Volatility
NWHVX vs. GMXAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) is 3.97%, while Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that NWHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWHVX | GMXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 4.32% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 11.63% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 15.77% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 19.68% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 21.25% | -1.61% |
NWHVX vs. GMXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GMXAX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWHVX vs. GMXAX - Dividend Comparison
NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, less than GMXAX's 11.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMXAX Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund | 11.35% | 12.93% | 11.73% | 6.17% | 9.58% | 12.52% | 3.18% | 5.18% | 23.21% | 0.85% | 9.60% | 13.94% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.14% | 7.96% | 11.93% | 16.14% | 36.45% | 34.64% | 6.16% | 18.85% | 38.53% | 11.37% | 8.97% | 13.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWHVX and GMXAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMXAX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to NWHVX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHVX dropped -37.12% vs GMXAX's -55.64%.
GMXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWHVX and GMXAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer