NWHVX vs. GBIAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) and GBIAX (Nationwide Bond Index Fund) are both mutual funds - NWHVX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while GBIAX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX returned 8.94%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GBIAX. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NWHVX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GBIAX.

Performance

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than GBIAX's -1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX has outperformed GBIAX with an annualized return of 8.94%, while GBIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.60% annualized return.

NWHVX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.19%
• 6M: -1.31%
• YTD: -1.49%
• 1Y: -5.83%
• 3Y*: 4.42%
• 5Y*: -0.05%
• 10Y*: 8.94%
• ALL TIME*: 8.34%

GBIAX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.45%
• 6M: -1.21%
• YTD: -1.14%
• 1Y: 1.03%
• 3Y*: 3.17%
• 5Y*: -1.20%
• 10Y*: 0.60%
• ALL TIME*: 3.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	-1.49%	-2.38%	9.89%	23.84%	-28.32%	25.03%	31.17%	29.96%	-2.97%	23.11%
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund	-1.14%	6.54%	0.44%	5.03%	-14.06%	-2.38%	6.60%	8.08%	-0.74%	2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHVX and GBIAX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013	-0.02

The correlation between NWHVX and GBIAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NWHVX vs. GBIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NWHVX

NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

GBIAX

GBIAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
GBIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
GBIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
GBIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
GBIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
GBIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NWHVX	GBIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	0.49	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	0.72	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.09	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	0.62	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	1.48	-2.33

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the GBIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHVX and GBIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, which is greater than GBIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and GBIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWHVX	GBIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.12%	-20.26%	-16.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.02%	-3.00%	-14.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.80%	-5.17%	-14.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.12%	-18.94%	-18.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.12%	-20.26%	-16.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.84%	-7.47%	-3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-3.06%	-4.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.14%	1.27%	+6.87%

Volatility

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) at 1.00%. This indicates that NWHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWHVX	GBIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	1.00%	+3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.92%	2.99%	+8.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	3.84%	+11.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	6.01%	+13.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.66%	4.96%	+14.70%

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIAX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWHVX vs. GBIAX - Dividend Comparison

NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, more than GBIAX's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund	3.08%	3.18%	3.07%	2.57%	1.59%	3.02%	1.79%	2.27%	2.29%	1.93%	2.15%	2.43%
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.08%	7.96%	11.93%	16.14%	36.45%	34.64%	6.16%	18.85%	38.53%	11.37%	8.97%	13.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWHVX and GBIAX in my portfolio?

NWHVX and GBIAX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWHVX or GBIAX?

NWHVX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to GBIAX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHVX dropped -37.12% vs GBIAX's -20.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.