PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWGSX vs. NWHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide WCM Focused Small Cap Fund (NWGSX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWGSX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NWGSX has underperformed NWHVX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while NWHVX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


NWGSX

1D
0.62%
1M
3.52%
YTD
5.31%
6M
3.22%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
8.32%

NWHVX

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-5.23%
6M
-6.54%
1Y
-9.41%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWGSX
Nationwide WCM Focused Small Cap Fund
5.31%-5.72%3.23%26.14%-14.72%19.18%1.19%28.90%-8.64%13.95%
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
-5.23%-2.38%9.89%23.84%-28.32%25.03%31.17%29.96%-2.97%23.11%

Correlation

The correlation between NWGSX and NWHVX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013

0.81

The correlation between NWGSX and NWHVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWGSX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWGSX
NWGSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NWGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NWGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NWHVX
NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide WCM Focused Small Cap Fund (NWGSX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWGSXNWHVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.92

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.48

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

-1.03

+3.01

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the NWHVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWGSX and NWHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWGSX drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, which is greater than NWHVX's maximum drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWGSX and NWHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWGSXNWHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.36%

-37.12%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-17.82%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.66%

-19.80%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.66%

-37.12%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

-37.12%

-9.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.72%

-14.22%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-7.85%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

8.29%

-2.80%

Volatility

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide WCM Focused Small Cap Fund (NWGSX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) at 4.74%. This indicates that NWGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWGSXNWHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

4.74%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

11.79%

+2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

14.84%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

19.93%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

19.71%

+2.49%

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWGSX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWGSX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison

NWGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.38%, more than NWHVX's 8.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWGSX
Nationwide WCM Focused Small Cap Fund
24.38%25.67%4.86%3.16%2.09%2.19%0.00%4.35%64.46%8.48%0.13%3.32%
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.40%7.96%11.93%16.14%36.45%34.64%6.16%18.85%38.53%11.37%8.97%13.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWGSX and NWHVX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWGSX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to NWHVX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWGSX dropped -46.36% vs NWHVX's -37.12%.

NWGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWGSX and NWHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer