NWAQX vs. NWHVX

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

NWAQX (Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund) and NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NWAQX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Nationwide, while NWHVX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 5 years, NWAQX returned 8.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NWHVX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for NWHVX.

Performance

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund (NWAQX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWAQX achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -1.31% return.

NWAQX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 9.85%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 16.82%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

NWHVX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: -1.12%
• YTD: -1.31%
• 1Y: -8.45%
• 3Y*: 5.14%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 9.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NWAQX Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund	10.56%	19.12%	12.92%	20.25%	-19.01%	17.34%	24.26%
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	-1.31%	-2.38%	9.89%	23.84%	-28.32%	25.03%	37.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NWAQX and NWHVX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.86

The correlation between NWAQX and NWHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NWAQX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWAQX

NWAQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
NWAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
NWAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NWAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NWAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NWAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

NWHVX

NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund (NWAQX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NWAQX	NWHVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	-0.49	+2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	-0.60	+2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.93	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	-0.41	+2.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	-0.86	+10.78

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWAQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the NWHVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWAQX and NWHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWAQX drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, smaller than the maximum NWHVX drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWAQX and NWHVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWAQX	NWHVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.29%	-37.12%	+7.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-17.82%	+8.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	-19.80%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.97%	-37.12%	+10.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-10.67%	+9.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-7.86%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	8.50%	-6.42%

Volatility

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund (NWAQX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) at 4.75%. This indicates that NWAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWAQX	NWHVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	4.75%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.61%	11.96%	-1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	14.88%	-2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	19.95%	-4.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	19.64%	-0.96%

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWAQX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison

NWAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than NWHVX's 8.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NWAQX Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund	5.97%	6.54%	9.49%	2.23%	1.38%	5.43%	6.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.07%	7.96%	11.93%	16.14%	36.45%	34.64%	6.16%	18.85%	38.53%	11.37%	8.97%	13.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWAQX and NWHVX in my portfolio?

NWAQX and NWHVX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWAQX or NWHVX?

NWAQX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to NWHVX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWAQX dropped -29.29% vs NWHVX's -37.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NWAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.