NWAQX vs. NDMAX
NWAQX (Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund) and NDMAX (Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund) are both mutual funds - NWAQX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Nationwide, while NDMAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 5 years, NWAQX returned 8.50%/yr vs 7.46%/yr for NDMAX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NWAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for NDMAX.
Performance
NWAQX vs. NDMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWAQX achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than NDMAX's 10.02% return.
NWAQX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
NDMAX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
NWAQX vs. NDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWAQX Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund | 10.56% | 19.12% | 12.92% | 20.25% | -19.01% | 17.34% | 24.26% |
NDMAX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund | 10.02% | 15.92% | 12.14% | 18.16% | -17.78% | 14.69% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWAQX and NDMAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between NWAQX and NDMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWAQX vs. NDMAX — Risk / Return Rank
NWAQX
NDMAX
NWAQX vs. NDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund (NWAQX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWAQX | NDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.47 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 10.36 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWAQX vs. NDMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWAQX drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, smaller than the maximum NDMAX drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWAQX and NDMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWAQX | NDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -47.85% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -7.79% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -13.33% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -27.51% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.90% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -8.16% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.85% | +0.23% |
Volatility
NWAQX vs. NDMAX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund (NWAQX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) at 4.57%. This indicates that NWAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWAQX | NDMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.57% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 9.26% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 10.96% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 13.77% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 14.43% | +4.25% |
NWAQX vs. NDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NDMAX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWAQX vs. NDMAX - Dividend Comparison
NWAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than NDMAX's 8.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDMAX Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund | 8.49% | 9.28% | 16.19% | 6.30% | 3.88% | 5.83% | 5.68% | 8.26% | 14.63% | 10.61% | 8.26% | 7.82% |
NWAQX Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund | 5.97% | 6.54% | 9.49% | 2.23% | 1.38% | 5.43% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, NWAQX and NDMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NWAQX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to NDMAX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWAQX dropped -29.29% vs NDMAX's -47.85%.
NDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWAQX and NDMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer