PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVYY vs. TSLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVYY vs. TSLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than TSLW's -9.26% return.


NVYY

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.98%
YTD
4.60%
6M
3.99%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLW

1D
-0.18%
1M
9.09%
YTD
-9.26%
6M
-9.14%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVYY vs. TSLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
4.60%26.95%
TSLW
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF
-9.26%33.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NVYY and TSLW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVYY vs. TSLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVYY
NVYY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NVYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVYY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVYY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLW
TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVYY vs. TSLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVYYTSLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

0.57

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

1.29

+3.52

NVYY vs. TSLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVYY Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the TSLW Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVYY and TSLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVYYTSLWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.37

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

0.39

+1.09

Drawdowns

NVYY vs. TSLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum TSLW drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and TSLW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVYYTSLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-35.80%

+20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.90%

-35.80%

+20.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-18.23%

+13.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-12.88%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

15.77%

-9.27%

Volatility

NVYY vs. TSLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) is 4.65%, while Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that NVYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVYYTSLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

14.56%

-9.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.78%

32.83%

-16.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.28%

55.52%

-31.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.10%

55.52%

-31.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

55.52%

-31.42%

NVYY vs. TSLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVYY vs. TSLW - Dividend Comparison

NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 147.62%, more than TSLW's 84.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025
NVYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
147.62%75.30%
TSLW
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF
84.61%49.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVYY and TSLW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLW has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVYY dropped -14.90% vs TSLW's -35.80%.

On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 31.22% vs 20.22% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 31.22% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.

NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 147.62%, compared with 84.61% for TSLW.

NVYY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NVYY and 0.99% for TSLW.

NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVYY and TSLW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer