NVYY vs. TSLW
NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) and TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVYY returned 5.34% vs -3.40% for TSLW. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NVYY charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSLW.
Performance
NVYY vs. TSLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than TSLW's -38.16% return.
NVYY
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.50%
TSLW
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -25.15%
- 6M
- -34.54%
- YTD
- -38.16%
- 1Y
- -3.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $370.19K | $517.73K | $1.09M | |
| $2.02M | $1.80M | $2.69M |
NVYY vs. TSLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 1.80% | 29.10% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -38.16% | 35.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVYY and TSLW is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVYY vs. TSLW — Risk / Return Rank
NVYY
TSLW
NVYY vs. TSLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | -0.12 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -0.29 | +0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVYY vs. TSLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum TSLW drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and TSLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -47.19% | +32.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -47.19% | +32.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | -44.27% | +36.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -14.92% | +9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.08% | 19.01% | -11.93% |
Volatility
NVYY vs. TSLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) is 3.86%, while Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a volatility of 24.91%. This indicates that NVYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 24.91% | -21.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 41.72% | -27.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.64% | 55.54% | -31.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 58.84% | -35.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 58.84% | -35.84% |
NVYY vs. TSLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVYY vs. TSLW - Dividend Comparison
NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 137.34%, more than TSLW's 121.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 133.06% | 75.30% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 121.20% | 49.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVYY and TSLW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLW has higher volatility (24.91%) compared to NVYY (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVYY dropped -14.90% vs TSLW's -47.19%.
On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 5.34% vs -3.40% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 5.34% return vs -3.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVYY.
NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 133.06%, compared with 121.20% for TSLW.
NVYY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVYY and 0.99% for TSLW.
NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVYY and TSLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer