NVYY vs. TSLW
NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) and TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVYY returned 31.22% vs 20.22% for TSLW. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSLW.
Performance
NVYY vs. TSLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than TSLW's -9.26% return.
NVYY
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVYY vs. TSLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 4.60% | 26.95% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -9.26% | 33.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVYY and TSLW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVYY vs. TSLW — Risk / Return Rank
NVYY
TSLW
NVYY vs. TSLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 0.57 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 1.29 | +3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.37 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.39 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
NVYY vs. TSLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum TSLW drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and TSLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -35.80% | +20.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -35.80% | +20.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -18.23% | +13.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -12.88% | +7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 15.77% | -9.27% |
Volatility
NVYY vs. TSLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) is 4.65%, while Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that NVYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 14.56% | -9.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 32.83% | -16.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.28% | 55.52% | -31.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 55.52% | -31.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 55.52% | -31.42% |
NVYY vs. TSLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVYY vs. TSLW - Dividend Comparison
NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 147.62%, more than TSLW's 84.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 147.62% | 75.30% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 84.61% | 49.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVYY and TSLW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLW has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVYY dropped -14.90% vs TSLW's -35.80%.
On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 31.22% vs 20.22% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 31.22% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.
NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 147.62%, compared with 84.61% for TSLW.
NVYY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NVYY and 0.99% for TSLW.
NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVYY and TSLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer