PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVMI vs. MPWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVMI vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nova Ltd (NVMI) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NVMI having a 77.55% return and MPWR slightly lower at 74.38%. Over the past 10 years, NVMI has outperformed MPWR with an annualized return of 47.99%, while MPWR has yielded a comparatively lower 37.94% annualized return.


NVMI

1D
4.19%
1M
15.76%
YTD
77.55%
6M
84.60%
1Y
155.07%
3Y*
70.07%
5Y*
41.92%
10Y*
47.99%

MPWR

1D
-0.77%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
74.38%
6M
67.26%
1Y
121.18%
3Y*
44.43%
5Y*
36.35%
10Y*
37.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVMI vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVMI
Nova Ltd
77.55%66.74%43.35%68.21%-44.25%107.51%86.62%66.07%-12.08%96.88%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
74.38%54.45%-5.55%79.78%-27.78%35.49%107.49%54.80%4.49%38.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NVMI and MPWR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.40

Over the past year, NVMI and MPWR have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVMI:

$20.08B

MPWR:

$77.67B

EPS

NVMI:

$7.94

MPWR:

$13.89

PE Ratio

NVMI:

73.41

MPWR:

113.54

PEG Ratio

NVMI:

2.55

MPWR:

1.43

PS Ratio

NVMI:

21.45

MPWR:

25.93

PB Ratio

NVMI:

14.47

MPWR:

21.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVMI:

$902.53M

MPWR:

$2.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVMI:

$518.59M

MPWR:

$1.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVMI:

$293.89M

MPWR:

$861.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVMI vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVMI
NVMI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NVMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NVMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MPWR
MPWR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVMI vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nova Ltd (NVMI) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVMIMPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.24

5.43

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.34

14.45

+4.89

NVMI vs. MPWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the MPWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVMI and MPWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVMI vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVMI drawdown since its inception was -98.22%, which is greater than MPWR's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVMI and MPWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVMIMPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.22%

-72.27%

-25.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.56%

-22.45%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.79%

-51.65%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.76%

-51.65%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.76%

-51.65%

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.66%

+6.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-17.71%

-34.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.05%

8.44%

-0.39%

Volatility

NVMI vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison

Nova Ltd (NVMI) has a higher volatility of 24.56% compared to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) at 20.33%. This indicates that NVMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVMIMPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.56%

20.33%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.88%

37.42%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.74%

48.53%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.49%

53.53%

-6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.42%

47.23%

-3.81%

Dividends

NVMI vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison

NVMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.42%0.69%0.85%0.63%0.85%0.49%0.55%0.90%1.03%0.71%0.98%1.26%
NVMI
Nova Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVMI vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nova Ltd and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
235.31M
804.19M
(NVMI) Total Revenue
(MPWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVMI vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nova Ltd and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%56.0%57.0%58.0%59.0%20222023202420252026
57.7%
55.3%
Portfolio components
NVMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nova Ltd reported a gross profit of 135.69M and revenue of 235.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

MPWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

NVMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nova Ltd reported an operating income of 70.84M and revenue of 235.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

MPWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.

NVMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nova Ltd reported a net income of 69.26M and revenue of 235.31M, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.

MPWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVMI and MPWR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVMI has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to MPWR (20.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVMI dropped -98.22% vs MPWR's -72.27%.

NVMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVMI and MPWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer