NVIR vs. FLMI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NVIR (Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF) and FLMI (Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVIR is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while FLMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVIR returned 19.23%/yr vs 6.04%/yr for FLMI. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. NVIR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLMI.

Performance

NVIR vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIR achieves a 21.37% return, which is significantly higher than FLMI's 2.35% return.

NVIR

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 21.37%
• 6M: 21.15%
• 1Y: 36.03%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLMI

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 8.32%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVIR vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	21.37%	9.84%	17.53%	6.90%
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF	2.35%	5.89%	4.91%	6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NVIR and FLMI is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023	-0.04

The correlation between NVIR and FLMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NVIR vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVIR

NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 72
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FLMI

FLMI Risk / Return Rank: 75
FLMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FLMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLMI Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FLMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FLMI Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVIR vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVIR	FLMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.70	-0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	4.08	-1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.61	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.33	2.82	+2.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.46	10.17	+5.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVIR vs. FLMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVIR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FLMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVIR and FLMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVIR	FLMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.70	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.65	+0.24

Drawdowns

NVIR vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIR drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, which is greater than FLMI's maximum drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIR and FLMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVIR	FLMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.47%	-14.66%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-2.90%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.47%	-5.31%	-17.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.72%	-0.29%	-3.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-2.82%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	0.80%	+1.62%

Volatility

NVIR vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) at 1.01%. This indicates that NVIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVIR	FLMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.74%	1.01%	+4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	2.04%	+10.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	3.10%	+12.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	4.45%	+14.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	4.72%	+14.53%

NVIR vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVIR vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison

NVIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FLMI's 3.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF	3.87%	3.89%	4.08%	3.71%	3.08%	2.22%	2.09%	2.71%	2.41%	0.34%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	0.75%	0.92%	1.50%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVIR and FLMI in my portfolio?

NVIR and FLMI have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVIR or FLMI?

NVIR has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to FLMI (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVIR dropped -22.47% vs FLMI's -14.66%.

Which ETF is better, NVIR or FLMI?

On 3-year performance, NVIR leads with 19.23% vs 6.04% for FLMI. On fees, FLMI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVIR or FLMI?

Over the 3-year period, NVIR has performed better with a 19.23% return vs 6.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVIR or FLMI?

FLMI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NVIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVIR or FLMI?

FLMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.75% for NVIR.

What is the main difference between NVIR and FLMI?

NVIR is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLMI is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NVIR and 0.30% for FLMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.