NVIR vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NVIR (Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVIR returned 19.23%/yr vs 21.04%/yr for EIPX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NVIR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

NVIR vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVIR having a 21.37% return and EIPX slightly higher at 21.73%.

NVIR

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 21.37%
• 6M: 21.15%
• 1Y: 36.03%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EIPX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 21.73%
• 6M: 20.44%
• 1Y: 31.08%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVIR vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	21.37%	9.84%	17.53%	6.90%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	21.73%	11.44%	19.11%	9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NVIR and EIPX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023	0.86

The correlation between NVIR and EIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

NVIR vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVIR	EIPX
Energy	78.9%	69.5%
Industrials	11.1%	4.2%
Utilities	3.1%	26.1%
Technology	2.6%	0.2%
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NVIR vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVIR

NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 72
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 87
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVIR vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVIR	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.80	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.94	-0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.47	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.33	7.90	-2.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.46	22.02	-6.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVIR vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVIR Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the EIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVIR and EIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVIR	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.80	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.19	-0.30

Drawdowns

NVIR vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIR drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIR and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVIR	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.47%	-15.43%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-4.12%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.47%	-15.43%	-7.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.72%	-2.77%	-0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-2.27%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	1.48%	+0.94%

Volatility

NVIR vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 4.02%. This indicates that NVIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVIR	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.74%	4.02%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	8.52%	+3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	11.21%	+4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	15.07%	+4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	15.07%	+4.18%

NVIR vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVIR vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

NVIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than EIPX's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.68%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	0.75%	0.92%	1.50%	1.34%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVIR and EIPX in my portfolio?

NVIR and EIPX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVIR or EIPX?

NVIR has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to EIPX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVIR dropped -22.47% vs EIPX's -15.43%.

Which ETF is better, NVIR or EIPX?

On 3-year performance, EIPX leads with 21.04% vs 19.23% for NVIR. On fees, NVIR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVIR or EIPX?

Over the 3-year period, EIPX has performed better with a 21.04% return vs 19.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVIR or EIPX?

NVIR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVIR or EIPX?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.75% for NVIR.

What is the main difference between NVIR and EIPX?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NVIR and 0.95% for EIPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.