NVII vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVII (REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVII returned 62.33% vs 5.69% for LQTI. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

NVII vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVII achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.

NVII

• 1D: -3.35%
• 1M: 6.25%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 18.61%
• 1Y: 62.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVII vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF	15.50%	48.28%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NVII and LQTI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

NVII vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVII

NVII Risk / Return Rank: 52
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 46
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 50

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVII vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVII	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.12	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	1.64	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.19	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	1.68	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	5.15	+3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVII vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVII Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVII and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVII	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.12	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.04	0.88	+1.15

Drawdowns

NVII vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVII drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVII and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVII	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.47%	-3.41%	-15.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.47%	-3.41%	-15.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.54%	-1.44%	-7.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-0.88%	-4.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.24%	1.11%	+6.13%

Volatility

NVII vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that NVII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVII	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.22%	1.65%	+10.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.24%	4.02%	+21.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.40%	5.10%	+29.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.54%	5.97%	+28.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.54%	5.97%	+28.57%

NVII vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVII vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.55%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF	51.55%	29.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVII and LQTI in my portfolio?

NVII and LQTI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVII or LQTI?

NVII has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVII dropped -18.47% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, NVII or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 62.33% vs 5.69% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVII or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 62.33% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVII or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVII or LQTI?

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 51.55%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between NVII and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: REX and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVII and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.