PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVII vs. BTCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVII vs. BTCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVII achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than BTCL's -53.22% return.


NVII

1D
-3.35%
1M
6.25%
YTD
15.50%
6M
18.61%
1Y
62.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCL

1D
-5.48%
1M
-35.14%
YTD
-53.22%
6M
-59.97%
1Y
-74.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVII vs. BTCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
15.50%48.28%
BTCL
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
-53.22%-45.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NVII and BTCL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVII vs. BTCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCL
BTCL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVII vs. BTCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVIIBTCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.83

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

-0.93

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

-1.47

+10.11

NVII vs. BTCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVII Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the BTCL Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVII and BTCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVIIBTCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

-0.85

+2.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.04

-0.25

+2.29

Drawdowns

NVII vs. BTCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVII drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum BTCL drawdown of -79.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVII and BTCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVIIBTCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-79.66%

+61.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.47%

-79.66%

+61.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.54%

-79.66%

+71.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-34.15%

+28.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

50.49%

-43.25%

Volatility

NVII vs. BTCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) is 12.22%, while T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) has a volatility of 19.12%. This indicates that NVII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVIIBTCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.22%

19.12%

-6.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.24%

69.76%

-44.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.40%

87.35%

-52.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.54%

97.87%

-63.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.54%

97.87%

-63.33%

NVII vs. BTCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVII vs. BTCL - Dividend Comparison

NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.55%, more than BTCL's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCL
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
3.62%1.70%4.35%
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
51.55%29.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVII and BTCL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCL has higher volatility (19.12%) compared to NVII (12.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVII dropped -18.47% vs BTCL's -79.66%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 62.33% vs -74.22% for BTCL. On fees, BTCL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NVII has been the lower-risk option at 12.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 62.33% return vs -74.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 51.55%, compared with 3.62% for BTCL.

NVII is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCL is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVII and 0.95% for BTCL.

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVII and BTCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer