NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO
NVHE.TO (Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - NVHE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVHE.TO returned 63.05% vs 2.79% for HPYM.TO. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. NVHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HPYM.TO.
Performance
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVHE.TO achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly higher than HPYM.TO's -1.25% return.
NVHE.TO
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 19.13%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- 1Y
- 63.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NVHE.TO Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 19.13% | 31.47% | 10.09% |
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | -1.25% | 6.72% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVHE.TO and HPYM.TO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NVHE.TO
HPYM.TO
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVHE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.11 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 0.73 | +2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 2.05 | +6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVHE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 0.62 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.37 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.87%, which is greater than HPYM.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVHE.TO and HPYM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVHE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.87% | -6.19% | -34.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.41% | -3.85% | -14.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -2.71% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.56% | -1.94% | -7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.69% | 1.36% | +6.33% |
Volatility
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) at 2.02%. This indicates that NVHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPYM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVHE.TO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | 2.02% | +9.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.62% | 3.28% | +23.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.87% | 4.53% | +30.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 5.61% | +43.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 5.61% | +43.50% |
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HPYM.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVHE.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison
NVHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.19%, more than HPYM.TO's 9.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.38% | 9.01% | 8.07% |
NVHE.TO Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 21.19% | 21.62% | 7.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVHE.TO and HPYM.TO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVHE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVHE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HPYM.TO.
NVHE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HPYM.TO is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NVHE.TO and 0.45% for HPYM.TO.
Find the right allocation for NVHE.TO and HPYM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer