PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDX vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDX vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.13% return.


NVDX

1D
-7.09%
1M
-3.81%
6M
4.09%
YTD
1.87%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
1.92%
1M
18.08%
6M
14.43%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
120.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDX vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDX and WNTR is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDX vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDX vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDXWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

2.84

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

7.31

-6.63

NVDX vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDX and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDX vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDXWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.19%

-42.65%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.76%

-42.65%

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.05%

-10.15%

-18.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-20.53%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.34%

16.58%

+4.76%

Volatility

NVDX vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a higher volatility of 21.76% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 18.84%. This indicates that NVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDXWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.76%

18.84%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.70%

47.46%

+7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.48%

53.83%

+17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.09%

53.56%

+41.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.09%

53.56%

+41.53%

NVDX vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDX vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
3.29%3.35%15.48%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
102.14%58.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDX and WNTR have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDX has higher volatility (21.76%) compared to WNTR (18.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 14.31% for NVDX. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 14.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 3.29% for NVDX.

NVDX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDX and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDX and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer