NVDX vs. WEBL
NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NVDX is actively managed, while WEBL is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDX returned 57.42% vs -8.47% for WEBL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WEBL.
Performance
NVDX vs. WEBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than WEBL's -14.87% return.
NVDX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -26.24%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 57.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEBL
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -15.88%
- 1Y
- -8.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.57%
- 5Y*
- -21.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDX vs. WEBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 5.90% | 26.24% | 384.03% | 28.06% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | -14.87% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 55.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDX and WEBL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between NVDX and WEBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NVDX vs. WEBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVDX
WEBL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
NVDX
WEBL
Basic Materials
NVDX
-
WEBL
-
Communication Services
NVDX
-
WEBL
Consumer Cyclical
NVDX
-
WEBL
Consumer Defensive
NVDX
-
WEBL
-
Energy
NVDX
-
WEBL
-
Financial Services
NVDX
-
WEBL
Healthcare
NVDX
-
WEBL
Industrials
NVDX
-
WEBL
Real Estate
NVDX
-
WEBL
-
Utilities
NVDX
-
WEBL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDX vs. WEBL — Risk / Return Rank
NVDX
WEBL
NVDX vs. WEBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDX | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.01 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | -0.23 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | -0.48 | +3.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDX vs. WEBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, smaller than the maximum WEBL drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and WEBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDX | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.19% | -94.44% | +26.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.76% | -56.57% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -60.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -94.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.24% | -74.94% | +48.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.30% | -58.90% | +38.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.70% | 26.44% | -6.74% |
Volatility
NVDX vs. WEBL - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a higher volatility of 26.64% compared to Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) at 19.12%. This indicates that NVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDX | WEBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.64% | 19.12% | +7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.29% | 45.07% | +8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.00% | 57.70% | +12.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.57% | 80.76% | +14.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.57% | 82.82% | +12.75% |
NVDX vs. WEBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBL's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDX vs. WEBL - Dividend Comparison
NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than WEBL's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 3.16% | 3.35% | 15.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.23% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDX and WEBL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDX has higher volatility (26.64%) compared to WEBL (19.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs WEBL's -94.44%.
On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 57.42% vs -8.47% for WEBL. On fees, NVDX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 19.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 57.42% return vs -8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 0.23% for WEBL.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDX and 1.17% for WEBL.
NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDX and WEBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer