PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDX vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDX vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.


NVDX

1D
-1.74%
1M
-8.51%
YTD
8.64%
6M
11.25%
1Y
58.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDX vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
8.64%26.24%384.03%28.06%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%4.96%5.25%2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDX and IBIC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDX vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDX vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDXIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

2.21

-1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

16.41

-15.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

58.11

-55.20

NVDX vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDX and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDX vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDXIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.19%

-0.90%

-67.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.76%

-0.27%

-43.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.33%

-0.11%

-24.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.33%

-0.10%

-20.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.99%

0.08%

+19.91%

Volatility

NVDX vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a higher volatility of 25.45% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that NVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDXIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.45%

0.16%

+25.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.08%

0.67%

+52.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.57%

0.89%

+69.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.43%

1.57%

+93.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.43%

1.57%

+93.86%

NVDX vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDX vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
3.08%3.35%15.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDX and IBIC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDX has higher volatility (25.45%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 58.04% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 58.04% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDX.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.08% for NVDX.

NVDX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDX and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDX and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer