NVDX vs. HIBL

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NVDX is actively managed, while HIBL is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDX returned 60.92% vs 220.73% for HIBL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.

Performance

NVDX vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 70.47% return.

NVDX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -8.62%
• YTD: 9.58%
• 6M: 9.23%
• 1Y: 60.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIBL

• 1D: 5.66%
• 1M: 5.92%
• YTD: 70.47%
• 6M: 66.00%
• 1Y: 220.73%
• 3Y*: 51.97%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDX vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	9.58%	26.24%	384.03%	28.06%
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	70.47%	60.38%	-0.40%	66.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDX and HIBL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	0.54

The correlation between NVDX and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

NVDX vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVDX	HIBL
Technology	100.0%	45.8%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Communication Services	-	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.6%
Energy	-	2.2%
Financial Services	-	12.5%
Healthcare	-	2.9%
Industrials	-	11.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

NVDX vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDX

NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 29
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

HIBL

HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 87
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDX vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDX	HIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	3.25	-2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	3.02	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.40	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	7.08	-5.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.14	25.53	-22.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDX vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDX and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDX	HIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	3.25	-2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	0.22	+1.11

Drawdowns

NVDX vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and HIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDX	HIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.19%	-88.27%	+20.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.76%	-31.39%	-12.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-69.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.68%	-15.10%	-8.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.27%	-44.14%	+23.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.47%	8.69%	+10.78%

Volatility

NVDX vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) is 25.98%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 28.76%. This indicates that NVDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDX	HIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.98%	28.76%	-2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.60%	54.14%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.45%	68.58%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.62%	82.57%	+13.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.62%	92.09%	+3.53%

NVDX vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDX vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than HIBL's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	1.36%	2.43%	0.82%	0.69%	0.00%	0.06%	0.19%	0.19%
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	3.06%	3.35%	15.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDX and HIBL in my portfolio?

NVDX and HIBL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDX or HIBL?

HIBL has higher volatility (28.76%) compared to NVDX (25.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

Which ETF is better, NVDX or HIBL?

On 1-year performance, HIBL leads with 220.73% vs 60.92% for NVDX. On fees, NVDX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDX has been the lower-risk option at 25.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDX or HIBL?

Over the 1-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 220.73% return vs 60.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDX or HIBL?

NVDX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDX or HIBL?

NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.36% for HIBL.

What is the main difference between NVDX and HIBL?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDX and 1.12% for HIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.