NVDU vs. MULL
NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDU returned 84.73% vs 6074.28% for MULL. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDU charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
NVDU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDU achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.
NVDU
- 1D
- -7.30%
- 1M
- 14.13%
- YTD
- 19.93%
- 6M
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 19.93% | 33.65% | -21.06% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDU and MULL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between NVDU and MULL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
NVDU vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVDU
MULL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
NVDU
MULL
Basic Materials
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Communication Services
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Consumer Cyclical
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Consumer Defensive
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Energy
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Financial Services
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Healthcare
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Industrials
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Real Estate
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Utilities
NVDU
-
MULL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
NVDU
MULL
NVDU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 46.71 | -45.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 7.02 | -5.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.89 | -0.66 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 116.34 | -114.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 390.40 | -385.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 46.71 | -45.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 7.45 | -6.31 |
Drawdowns
NVDU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDU drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDU and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -72.29% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.27% | -53.09% | +10.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.32% | 0.00% | -18.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -20.62% | +1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.47% | 15.79% | +2.68% |
Volatility
NVDU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) is 24.74%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that NVDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDU | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.74% | 55.41% | -30.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.50% | 105.59% | -55.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.02% | 132.38% | -64.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.06% | 136.22% | -45.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.06% | 136.22% | -45.16% |
NVDU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
NVDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 4.83% | 5.68% | 16.85% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDU and MULL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to NVDU (24.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDU dropped -67.27% vs MULL's -72.29%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 84.73% for NVDU. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, NVDU has been the lower-risk option at 24.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 84.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for NVDU and 1.50% for MULL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDU and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer