NVDU vs. INTW
NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDU returned 51.92% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDU charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
NVDU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDU achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.
NVDU
- 1D
- -8.71%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 51.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -12.49%
- 1M
- 12.21%
- YTD
- 750.22%
- 6M
- 775.58%
- 1Y
- 1,964.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 2.08% | 52.86% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 750.22% | 60.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDU and INTW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.30 |
NVDU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVDU
INTW
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
NVDU
INTW
Basic Materials
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Communication Services
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Consumer Cyclical
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Consumer Defensive
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Energy
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Financial Services
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Healthcare
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Industrials
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Real Estate
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Utilities
NVDU
-
INTW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
NVDU
INTW
NVDU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.65 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 40.32 | -39.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 91.49 | -88.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDU drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDU and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -60.58% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.27% | -49.34% | +7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.48% | -12.49% | -17.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.91% | -29.66% | +10.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 21.70% | -2.40% |
Volatility
NVDU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) is 26.33%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that NVDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.33% | 55.81% | -29.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.28% | 119.10% | -65.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.48% | 150.14% | -79.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.03% | 148.88% | -57.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.03% | 148.88% | -57.85% |
NVDU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
NVDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 5.68% | 5.68% | 16.85% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDU and INTW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to NVDU (26.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDU dropped -67.27% vs INTW's -60.58%.
On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 51.92% for NVDU. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, NVDU has been the lower-risk option at 26.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 51.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for NVDU and 1.50% for INTW.
INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDU and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer