PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDU vs. DLLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDU vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDU achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 757.76% return.


NVDU

1D
-7.30%
1M
14.13%
YTD
19.93%
6M
27.09%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DLLL

1D
-6.45%
1M
245.92%
YTD
757.76%
6M
648.38%
1Y
850.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDU vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDU and DLLL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.44

The correlation between NVDU and DLLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NVDU vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NVDU
DLLL

Technology

100.0%
66.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

NVDU
100.0%
DLLL
66.7%

Basic Materials

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Communication Services

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Consumer Defensive

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Energy

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Financial Services

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Healthcare

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Industrials

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Real Estate

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Utilities

NVDU

-

DLLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDU vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDU
NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDU vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDUDLLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

6.65

-5.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

4.81

-2.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.60

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

15.02

-13.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.60

31.34

-26.74

NVDU vs. DLLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the DLLL Sharpe Ratio of 6.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDU and DLLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDUDLLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

6.65

-5.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

3.16

-2.02

Drawdowns

NVDU vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDU drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, roughly equal to the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDU and DLLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDUDLLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.27%

-68.58%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.27%

-57.19%

+14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.32%

-18.86%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-25.91%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.47%

27.36%

-8.89%

Volatility

NVDU vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) is 24.74%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 69.39%. This indicates that NVDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDUDLLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.74%

69.39%

-44.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.50%

102.08%

-51.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.02%

129.28%

-61.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.06%

130.55%

-39.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.06%

130.55%

-39.49%

NVDU vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDU vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

NVDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
4.83%5.68%16.85%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDU and DLLL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to NVDU (24.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDU dropped -67.27% vs DLLL's -68.58%.

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs 84.73% for NVDU. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, NVDU has been the lower-risk option at 24.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs 84.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for NVDU and 1.50% for DLLL.

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDU and DLLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer