NVDS vs. SPDN
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - NVDS tracks the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%) while SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDS returned -62.36%/yr vs -11.95%/yr for SPDN. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
NVDS vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -18.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -6.10% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- 6.24%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- -18.53%
- 6M
- -16.59%
- 1Y
- -47.95%
- 3Y*
- -62.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- -14.93%
- 3Y*
- -11.95%
- 5Y*
- -8.36%
- 10Y*
- -12.66%
NVDS vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -18.53% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -16.72% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.10% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | -1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and SPDN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between NVDS and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
SPDN
NVDS vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.81 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.93 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -1.75 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than SPDN's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -75.31% | -24.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.48% | -16.05% | -40.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.90% | -38.24% | -57.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.25% | -74.71% | -24.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.59% | -48.66% | -34.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.37% | 9.44% | +26.93% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 20.03% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 4.51%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.03% | 4.51% | +15.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.67% | 9.82% | +30.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.16% | 12.59% | +40.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 16.95% | +51.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 18.04% | +50.85% |
NVDS vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.42%, more than SPDN's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 17.42% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 4.02% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and SPDN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (20.03%) compared to SPDN (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 3-year performance, SPDN leads with -11.95% vs -62.36% for NVDS. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -11.95% return vs -62.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 17.42%, compared with 4.02% for SPDN.
NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.50% for SPDN.
NVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.90 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer