NVDS vs. SPDN
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - NVDS tracks the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%) while SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDS returned -61.55%/yr vs -11.24%/yr for SPDN. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
NVDS vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -21.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -6.85% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- 5.35%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -22.24%
- YTD
- -21.24%
- 1Y
- -38.07%
- 3Y*
- -61.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -12.68%
- 3Y*
- -11.24%
- 5Y*
- -8.03%
- 10Y*
- -12.22%
NVDS vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -21.24% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -16.72% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.85% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | -1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and SPDN is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between NVDS and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
SPDN
NVDS vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.85 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.80 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | -1.53 | +0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than SPDN's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -75.31% | -24.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.88% | -15.93% | -32.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.83% | -38.24% | -57.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.28% | -74.91% | -24.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.79% | -48.79% | -35.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.28% | 8.28% | +17.00% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 4.18%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | 4.18% | +12.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.40% | 10.08% | +31.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.61% | 12.73% | +40.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.71% | 16.97% | +51.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.71% | 18.01% | +50.70% |
NVDS vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.02%, more than SPDN's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 18.02% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.33% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and SPDN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (16.55%) compared to SPDN (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 3-year performance, SPDN leads with -11.24% vs -61.55% for NVDS. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -11.24% return vs -61.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 18.02%, compared with 3.33% for SPDN.
NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.50% for SPDN.
NVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer