PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDS vs. CARD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDS vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -11.90% return.


NVDS

1D
-4.24%
1M
-10.37%
6M
-24.26%
YTD
-24.21%
1Y
-35.38%
3Y*
-62.25%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-68.81%

CARD

1D
-3.27%
1M
-1.66%
6M
-9.54%
YTD
-11.90%
1Y
-40.90%
3Y*
-49.61%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-52.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.40K$47.06K$45.44K
$5.22M$5.62M$7.37M

NVDS vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
-24.21%-58.18%-80.03%-22.24%
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-11.90%-60.21%-58.19%-32.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDS and CARD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDS vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDS
NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDS vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDSCARDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.94

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.94

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.44

-1.47

+0.03

NVDS vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is comparable to the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDS and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDS vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and CARD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDSCARDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-93.74%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.10%

-43.65%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.83%

-93.74%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.31%

-93.38%

-5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.02%

-69.59%

-14.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.60%

29.28%

-4.68%

Volatility

NVDS vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) is 18.42%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 23.55%. This indicates that NVDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDSCARDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.42%

23.55%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.03%

54.51%

-11.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.77%

72.06%

-17.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.61%

80.48%

-11.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.61%

80.48%

-11.87%

NVDS vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDS vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
18.72%14.19%14.11%14.69%5.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDS and CARD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARD has higher volatility (23.55%) compared to NVDS (18.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs CARD's -93.74%.

On 3-year performance, CARD leads with -49.61% vs -62.25% for NVDS. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 18.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CARD has performed better with a -49.61% return vs -62.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.

NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 18.72%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.

NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: AXS and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.95% for CARD.

CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDS and CARD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer