NVDS vs. CARD
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - NVDS tracks the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDS returned -62.25%/yr vs -49.61%/yr for CARD. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
NVDS vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -11.90% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- -4.24%
- 1M
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -24.26%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 1Y
- -35.38%
- 3Y*
- -62.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -68.81%
CARD
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 1Y
- -40.90%
- 3Y*
- -49.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -52.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.40K | $47.06K | $45.44K | |
| $5.22M | $5.62M | $7.37M |
NVDS vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -24.21% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -22.24% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -11.90% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -32.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and CARD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
CARD
NVDS vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDS | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.94 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | -0.94 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | -1.47 | +0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -93.74% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.10% | -43.65% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.83% | -93.74% | -2.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.31% | -93.38% | -5.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.02% | -69.59% | -14.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.60% | 29.28% | -4.68% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) is 18.42%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 23.55%. This indicates that NVDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.42% | 23.55% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.03% | 54.51% | -11.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.77% | 72.06% | -17.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 80.48% | -11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 80.48% | -11.87% |
NVDS vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 18.72% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and CARD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (23.55%) compared to NVDS (18.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs CARD's -93.74%.
On 3-year performance, CARD leads with -49.61% vs -62.25% for NVDS. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 18.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CARD has performed better with a -49.61% return vs -62.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 18.72%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: AXS and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer