NVDO vs. KJUL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) and KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. NVDO is actively managed, while KJUL is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KJUL.

Performance

NVDO vs. KJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDO achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than KJUL's 6.53% return.

NVDO

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 17.25%
• YTD: 20.98%
• 6M: 29.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 18.90%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDO vs. KJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	20.98%	11.12%
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	6.53%	4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDO and KJUL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

NVDO vs. KJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUL

KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 83
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDO vs. KJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDO	KJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.57	+0.83

Drawdowns

NVDO vs. KJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDO drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, roughly equal to the maximum KJUL drawdown of -16.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDO and KJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDO	KJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.25%	-16.69%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.42%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-0.10%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-4.00%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVDO	KJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	7.99%	+23.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.91%	12.31%	+19.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	11.67%	+20.24%

NVDO vs. KJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than KJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDO vs. KJUL - Dividend Comparison

NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, while KJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	13.77%	16.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDO and KJUL in my portfolio?

NVDO and KJUL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVDO or KJUL?

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDO or KJUL?

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDO or KJUL?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.00% for KJUL.

What is the main difference between NVDO and KJUL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for NVDO and 0.79% for KJUL.