NVDL vs. TSLQ
NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDL returned 97.81%/yr vs -61.47%/yr for TSLQ. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NVDL charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 39.32% return.
NVDL
- 1D
- 6.85%
- 1M
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 38.93%
- YTD
- 19.13%
- 1Y
- 19.05%
- 3Y*
- 97.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 146.14%
TSLQ
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- 56.37%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 1Y
- -47.66%
- 3Y*
- -61.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -55.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $380.97M | $415.87M | $666.11M | |
| $162.68M | $136.02M | $157.68M |
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 19.13% | 32.57% | 344.58% | 432.18% | -28.71% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 39.32% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 31.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDL and TSLQ is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDL vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
NVDL
TSLQ
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDL | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.96 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | -0.73 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.88 | -0.93 | +1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDL | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -98.73% | +31.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.23% | -65.58% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.55% | -97.85% | +30.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.75% | -97.92% | +79.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -68.51% | +51.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.78% | 54.47% | -32.69% |
Volatility
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) is 25.53%, while Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 31.97%. This indicates that NVDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDL | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.53% | 31.97% | -6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.52% | 67.43% | -10.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.65% | 92.65% | -20.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.01% | 95.59% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.01% | 95.59% | -5.58% |
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.58% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDL and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (31.97%) compared to NVDL (25.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.
On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 97.81% vs -61.47% for TSLQ. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDL has been the lower-risk option at 25.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 97.81% return vs -61.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
NVDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDL and 1.17% for TSLQ.
NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDL and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer