NVDL vs. TSLQ
NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDL returned 113.21%/yr vs -67.70%/yr for TSLQ. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. NVDL charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 24.36% return, which is significantly higher than TSLQ's -1.38% return.
NVDL
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 21.13%
- YTD
- 24.36%
- 6M
- 26.69%
- 1Y
- 90.12%
- 3Y*
- 113.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -16.62%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- -64.04%
- 3Y*
- -67.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 24.36% | 32.57% | 344.58% | 432.18% | -28.32% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -1.38% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 25.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDL and TSLQ is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDL vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
NVDL
TSLQ
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDL | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.90 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | -0.85 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | -1.07 | +5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDL | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | -0.69 | +2.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | -0.64 | +2.44 |
Drawdowns
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDL | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -98.73% | +31.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.23% | -75.93% | +33.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.55% | -97.85% | +30.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -98.53% | +83.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -67.22% | +50.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.41% | 59.81% | -41.40% |
Volatility
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) have volatilities of 24.75% and 24.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDL | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.75% | 24.20% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.90% | 54.90% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.08% | 92.72% | -24.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.39% | 94.07% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.39% | 94.07% | -3.68% |
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDL vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% | 0.00% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.71% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDL and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDL has higher volatility (24.75%) compared to TSLQ (24.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.
On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 113.21% vs -67.70% for TSLQ. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLQ has been the lower-risk option at 24.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 113.21% return vs -67.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.71%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
NVDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDL and 1.15% for TSLQ.
NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDL and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer