PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDL vs. PLTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDL vs. PLTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 24.36% return, which is significantly higher than PLTU's -47.14% return.


NVDL

1D
3.68%
1M
21.13%
YTD
24.36%
6M
26.69%
1Y
90.12%
3Y*
113.21%
5Y*
10Y*

PLTU

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.95%
YTD
-47.14%
6M
-47.66%
1Y
-18.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDL vs. PLTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
24.36%32.57%-8.25%
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
-47.14%223.17%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDL and PLTU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.46

NVDL vs. PLTU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NVDL
PLTU

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Technology

NVDL
100.0%
PLTU
100.0%

Basic Materials

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Communication Services

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Consumer Cyclical

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Consumer Defensive

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Energy

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Financial Services

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Healthcare

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Industrials

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Real Estate

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Utilities

NVDL
0.0%
PLTU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDL vs. PLTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTU
PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDL vs. PLTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDLPLTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

-0.27

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.91

-0.46

+5.37

NVDL vs. PLTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the PLTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDL and PLTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDLPLTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

-0.18

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

0.40

+1.40

Drawdowns

NVDL vs. PLTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTU drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and PLTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDLPLTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.55%

-69.14%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.23%

-68.10%

+25.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.19%

-63.25%

+48.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-31.98%

+15.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.41%

39.64%

-21.23%

Volatility

NVDL vs. PLTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) is 24.75%, while Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) has a volatility of 33.28%. This indicates that NVDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDLPLTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.75%

33.28%

-8.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.90%

77.26%

-26.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.08%

103.08%

-35.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.39%

127.08%

-36.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.39%

127.08%

-36.69%

NVDL vs. PLTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTU's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDL vs. PLTU - Dividend Comparison

NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.98%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
44.98%23.29%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDL and PLTU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTU has higher volatility (33.28%) compared to NVDL (24.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs PLTU's -69.14%.

On 1-year performance, NVDL leads with 90.12% vs -18.22% for PLTU. On fees, PLTU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, NVDL has been the lower-risk option at 24.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 90.12% return vs -18.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDL.

PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 44.98%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDL and 0.97% for PLTU.

NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDL and PLTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer