NVDL vs. CONL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDL returned 92.63%/yr vs -14.86%/yr for CONL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDL charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CONL.

Performance

NVDL vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -65.46% return.

NVDL

• 1D: -8.23%
• 1M: -15.60%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: -0.74%
• 1Y: 52.74%
• 3Y*: 92.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONL

• 1D: -7.83%
• 1M: -30.11%
• YTD: -65.46%
• 6M: -70.11%
• 1Y: -86.06%
• 3Y*: -14.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDL vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	2.41%	32.57%	344.58%	432.18%	-28.71%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-65.46%	-58.49%	4.23%	641.63%	-25.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDL and CONL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022	0.40

NVDL vs. CONL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVDL	CONL
Financial Services	100.0%	100.0%
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

NVDL vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 24
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDL vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDL	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	-0.63	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	-1.10	+2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.88	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	-0.93	+2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	-1.25	+4.00

NVDL vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDL and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDL vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDL	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.55%	-94.36%	+26.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.23%	-92.57%	+50.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.55%	-94.36%	+26.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.16%	-94.06%	+63.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.07%	-56.45%	+39.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.22%	68.94%	-49.72%

Volatility

NVDL vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) is 26.32%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 36.69%. This indicates that NVDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDL	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.32%	36.69%	-10.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.60%	102.83%	-49.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.66%	135.85%	-65.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.42%	149.59%	-59.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.42%	149.59%	-59.17%

NVDL vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDL vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVDL nor CONL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%	0.00%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDL and CONL in my portfolio?

NVDL and CONL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDL or CONL?

CONL has higher volatility (36.69%) compared to NVDL (26.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs CONL's -94.36%.

Which ETF is better, NVDL or CONL?

On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 92.63% vs -14.86% for CONL. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDL has been the lower-risk option at 26.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDL or CONL?

Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 92.63% return vs -14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDL or CONL?

NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDL or CONL?

NVDL and CONL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NVDL and CONL?

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDL and 1.15% for CONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.