NVDL vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDL returned 84.82% vs 2.93% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NVDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

NVDL vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.

NVDL

• 1D: -7.15%
• 1M: 14.24%
• YTD: 19.95%
• 6M: 27.27%
• 1Y: 84.82%
• 3Y*: 109.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDL vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	19.95%	32.57%	344.58%	21.83%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDL and BAMU is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between NVDL and BAMU has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.21, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

NVDL vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVDL	BAMU
Financial Services	100.0%	98.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NVDL vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 34
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDL vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDL	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	4.98	-3.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	8.77	-6.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	2.41	-1.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	24.89	-22.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.63	97.89	-93.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDL vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDL and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDL	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	4.98	-3.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	4.14	-2.37

Drawdowns

NVDL vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDL	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.55%	-0.36%	-67.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.23%	-0.12%	-42.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.19%	0.00%	-18.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.96%	-0.02%	-16.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.39%	0.03%	+18.36%

Volatility

NVDL vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a higher volatility of 24.77% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that NVDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDL	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.77%	0.07%	+24.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.80%	0.43%	+50.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.20%	0.59%	+67.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.43%	0.87%	+89.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.43%	0.87%	+89.56%

NVDL vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDL vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDL and BAMU in my portfolio?

NVDL and BAMU have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDL or BAMU?

NVDL has higher volatility (24.77%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, NVDL or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, NVDL leads with 84.82% vs 2.93% for BAMU. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDL or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 84.82% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDL or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDL or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.

What is the main difference between NVDL and BAMU?

NVDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDL and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.