PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NVDI.L (IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP) and 3GOE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDI.L is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while 3GOE.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index. NVDI.L is actively managed, while 3GOE.L is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDI.L returned 19.99% vs 597.07% for 3GOE.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3GOE.L.

Performance

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDI.L achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOE.L's 37.40% return.

NVDI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
8.35%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
2.01%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

3GOE.L

1D
10.59%
1M
-15.25%
YTD
37.40%
6M
29.89%
1Y
597.07%
3Y*
85.68%
5Y*
28.94%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
NVDI.L
IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP		-0.43%16.65%-7.10%
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs		37.40%133.65%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDI.L and 3GOE.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs

Often compared with NVDI.L:
NVDI.L vs. NVDYNVDI.L vs. QQQNVDI.L vs. SPYNVDI.L vs. AMZI.LNVDI.L vs. COIY.LNVDI.L vs. NVDANVDI.L vs. AVGI.L
Often compared with 3GOE.L:
3GOE.L vs. 2MU.L3GOE.L vs. 2GOO.L3GOE.L vs. 3ABN.L3GOE.L vs. 3PLT.L3GOE.L vs. 2BRE.L3GOE.L vs. 3SPY.L3GOE.L vs. KWE3.L

Return for Risk

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NVDI.L
NVDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NVDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NVDI.L3GOE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.62
6.77

-6.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.99
4.98

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.58

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

11.56

-10.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

36.18

-34.19

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDI.L and 3GOE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NVDI.L3GOE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

6.77

-6.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.32

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.59

-0.48

Drawdowns

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDI.L drawdown since its inception was -31.39%, smaller than the maximum 3GOE.L drawdown of -88.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDI.L and 3GOE.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NVDI.L3GOE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.39%

-88.62%

+57.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.59%

-51.18%

+29.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-69.84%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-88.62%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.62%

-22.74%

+13.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-43.41%

+33.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.98%

16.39%

-6.41%

Volatility

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L) is 10.09%, while Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a volatility of 24.09%. This indicates that NVDI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GOE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NVDI.L3GOE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

24.09%

-14.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

55.21%

-34.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.34%

87.38%

-55.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.31%

89.79%

-50.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.31%

89.29%

-49.98%

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 3GOE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDI.L vs. 3GOE.L - Dividend Comparison

NVDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.63%, while 3GOE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs		0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDI.L
IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP		20.63%32.04%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

NVDI.L and 3GOE.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GOE.L.

NVDI.L is categorized as Options Trading, while 3GOE.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NVDI.L and 0.75% for 3GOE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDI.L and 3GOE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer