PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. ZETA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. ZETA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than ZETA's -2.85% return.


NVDA

1D
3.54%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
14.05%
6M
20.66%
1Y
49.84%
3Y*
70.84%
5Y*
64.29%
10Y*
68.59%

ZETA

1D
-2.18%
1M
15.01%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
13.04%
1Y
62.58%
3Y*
29.75%
5Y*
18.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. ZETA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
14.05%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%69.49%
ZETA
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
-2.85%13.12%103.97%7.96%-2.97%-6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and ZETA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.35

The correlation between NVDA and ZETA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

ZETA:

-$0.14

PS Ratio

NVDA:

20.50

ZETA:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

ZETA:

$1.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

ZETA:

$881.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

ZETA:

$50.09M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. ZETA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ZETA
ZETA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ZETA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZETA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZETA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ZETA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZETA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. ZETA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDAZETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.56

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

3.16

+2.73

NVDA vs. ZETA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the ZETA Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and ZETA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. ZETA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than ZETA's maximum drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and ZETA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAZETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-70.01%

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-40.37%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-70.01%

+33.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-70.01%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.77%

-46.19%

+36.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-34.13%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

19.85%

-11.37%

Volatility

NVDA vs. ZETA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 12.97%, while Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) has a volatility of 24.86%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZETA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAZETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.97%

24.86%

-11.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.83%

48.84%

-22.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.13%

73.75%

-38.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.80%

72.06%

-20.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.87%

72.06%

-22.19%

Dividends

NVDA vs. ZETA - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while ZETA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
ZETA
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVDA vs. ZETA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Zeta Global Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
396.30M
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(ZETA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. ZETA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
59.0%
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

ZETA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 233.86M and revenue of 396.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

ZETA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -18.84M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

ZETA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -13.25M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and ZETA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZETA has higher volatility (24.86%) compared to NVDA (12.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs ZETA's -70.01%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and ZETA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer