PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. TGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. TGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than TGTX's 74.54% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed TGTX with an annualized return of 64.62%, while TGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 24.71% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
2.93%
1M
1.60%
6M
5.16%
YTD
7.77%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
62.93%
5Y*
59.52%
10Y*
64.62%
ALL TIME*
36.28%

TGTX

1D
-2.80%
1M
-2.78%
6M
76.79%
YTD
74.54%
1Y
46.56%
3Y*
70.54%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
24.71%
ALL TIME*
-7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.46B$26.13B$31.85B
$111.05M$115.82M$119.77M

NVDA vs. TGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.77%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
74.54%-0.96%76.23%44.38%-37.74%-63.48%368.65%170.73%-50.00%76.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and TGTX is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2010

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between NVDA and TGTX has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$4.86T

TGTX:

$7.96B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

TGTX:

$2.88

PE Ratio

NVDA:

30.73

TGTX:

18.04

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.17

TGTX:

0.03

PS Ratio

NVDA:

19.35

TGTX:

11.90

PB Ratio

NVDA:

25.05

TGTX:

14.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

TGTX:

$700.35M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

TGTX:

$581.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

TGTX:

$156.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. TGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TGTX
TGTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDA vs. TGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDATGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.74

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

3.46

-2.14

NVDA vs. TGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the TGTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and TGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. TGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, smaller than the maximum TGTX drawdown of -99.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and TGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDATGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-99.52%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-26.85%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-42.06%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-89.47%

+23.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-93.19%

+26.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.74%

-77.71%

+62.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-91.31%

+55.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.90%

13.66%

-3.76%

Volatility

NVDA vs. TGTX - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and TG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX) have volatilities of 12.04% and 12.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDATGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

12.23%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.30%

33.96%

-5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.41%

47.22%

-10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.87%

87.68%

-35.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.95%

86.71%

-36.76%

Dividends

NVDA vs. TGTX - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while TGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVDA vs. TGTX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and TG Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. TGTX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and TG Therapeutics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

TGTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TG Therapeutics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 171.41M and revenue of 204.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.7%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

TGTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TG Therapeutics, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.80M and revenue of 204.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

TGTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TG Therapeutics, Inc. reported a net income of 19.78M and revenue of 204.92M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and TGTX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGTX has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs TGTX's -99.52%.

TGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and TGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer