PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. MCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. MCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's -7.30% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed MCD with an annualized return of 68.14%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.32% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
-6.20%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.58%
1Y
46.72%
3Y*
74.54%
5Y*
63.58%
10Y*
68.14%

MCD

1D
2.61%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
-7.30%
6M
-8.97%
1Y
-7.23%
3Y*
1.82%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.11%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
-7.30%7.89%0.14%15.06%0.51%27.79%11.30%13.97%5.78%45.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and MCD is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 1999

0.20

The correlation between NVDA and MCD shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.00T

MCD:

$199.67B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

MCD:

$12.13

PE Ratio

NVDA:

31.43

MCD:

23.07

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.17

MCD:

3.71

PS Ratio

NVDA:

19.79

MCD:

7.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

MCD:

$27.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

MCD:

$12.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

MCD:

$14.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MCD
MCD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCD Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDAMCDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.94

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

-0.38

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

-1.00

+6.67

NVDA vs. MCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the MCD Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and MCD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDAMCDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

-0.44

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.35

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.37

0.56

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.53

+0.09

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than MCD's maximum drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and MCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAMCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-73.20%

-16.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-19.05%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-19.05%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-19.05%

-47.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-36.90%

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.90%

-16.93%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-14.89%

-21.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

7.29%

+0.98%

Volatility

NVDA vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to McDonald's Corporation (MCD) at 5.49%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAMCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.15%

5.49%

+7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.39%

12.09%

+14.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.76%

16.62%

+18.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.73%

17.27%

+34.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

20.40%

+29.44%

Dividends

NVDA vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than MCD's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
2.63%2.35%2.34%2.10%2.15%1.96%2.35%2.39%2.36%2.23%2.97%2.91%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. MCD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and McDonald's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
6.52B
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(MCD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. MCD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and McDonald's Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
0
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

MCD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

MCD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported an operating income of 2.95B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

MCD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and MCD have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to MCD (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs MCD's -73.20%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and MCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer