NVDA vs. LABU
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 67.95%/yr vs -11.11%/yr for LABU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVDA vs. LABU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed LABU with an annualized return of 67.95%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively lower -11.11% annualized return.
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -8.83%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
LABU
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 207.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- -34.35%
- 10Y*
- -11.11%
NVDA vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 12.06% | 79.17% | -26.02% | -13.41% | -80.36% | -64.15% | 74.66% | 75.50% | -57.61% | 149.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA and LABU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015 | 0.42 |
The correlation between NVDA and LABU shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA
LABU
NVDA vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDA | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 6.49 | -4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 18.31 | -13.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDA vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and LABU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.72% | -99.18% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -30.70% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.88% | -78.30% | +41.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.34% | -97.59% | +31.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.34% | -98.96% | +32.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -96.05% | +83.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -81.69% | +45.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 10.91% | -2.45% |
Volatility
NVDA vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.26%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 31.31%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.26% | 31.31% | -18.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | 61.52% | -34.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.00% | 77.69% | -42.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.76% | 95.70% | -43.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 95.45% | -45.61% |
Dividends
NVDA vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison
NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than LABU's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.69% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA and LABU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABU has higher volatility (31.31%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs LABU's -99.18%.
LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDA and LABU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer