NVDA vs. GDGB.L
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while GDGB.L (VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Over the past 5 years, NVDA returned 63.13%/yr vs 17.20%/yr for GDGB.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVDA vs. GDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NVDA is traded in USD, while GDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than GDGB.L's -7.35% return.
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
GDGB.L
- 1D
- 5.31%
- 1M
- -17.51%
- YTD
- -7.35%
- 6M
- -5.86%
- 1Y
- 49.71%
- 3Y*
- 38.28%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA vs. GDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 28.01% |
GDGB.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | -7.35% | 156.24% | 9.38% | 9.16% | -7.97% | -11.28% | 23.23% | 44.43% | -10.42% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA and GDGB.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA vs. GDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA
GDGB.L
NVDA vs. GDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDA | GDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.41 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 3.89 | +1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDA vs. GDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than GDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and GDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA | GDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.72% | -50.68% | -39.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -35.18% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.88% | -35.18% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.34% | -46.27% | -20.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -31.02% | +18.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -17.81% | -18.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 12.73% | -4.27% |
Volatility
NVDA vs. GDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.26%, while VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) has a volatility of 14.95%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA | GDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.26% | 14.95% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | 36.15% | -9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.00% | 44.61% | -9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.76% | 35.73% | +16.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 34.29% | +15.55% |
Dividends
NVDA vs. GDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while GDGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDGB.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA and GDGB.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NVDA and GDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer