NVDA vs. FWRG.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Over the past year, NVDA returned 41.70% vs 27.51% for FWRG.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVDA having a 10.16% return and FWRG.L slightly higher at 10.64%.

NVDA

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 17.38%
• 1Y: 41.70%
• 3Y*: 71.13%
• 5Y*: 63.13%
• 10Y*: 67.95%

FWRG.L

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 11.30%
• 1Y: 27.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	10.16%	38.92%	171.25%	17.35%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	10.64%	13.84%	20.11%	8,531.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and FWRG.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.36

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 75
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDA	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.58	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	3.59	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.49	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	3.84	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	15.15	-10.20

NVDA vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and FWRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA	FWRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.72%	-18.87%	-70.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-7.14%	-13.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.86%	-1.57%	-11.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.18%	-2.26%	-33.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.46%	1.81%	+6.65%

Volatility

NVDA vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 3.65%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA	FWRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.26%	3.65%	+9.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.67%	8.11%	+18.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.00%	10.63%	+24.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.76%	4,484.46%	-4,432.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.84%	4,484.46%	-4,434.62%

Dividends

NVDA vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while FWRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDA and FWRG.L in my portfolio?

NVDA and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.