NVDA vs. FFRHX
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) is Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 64.62%/yr vs 4.82%/yr for FFRHX. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NVDA vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 64.62%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.82% annualized return.
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
FFRHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B |
NVDA vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 2.14% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | 0.10% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA and FFRHX is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2000 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA
FFRHX
NVDA vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDA | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.81 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 4.51 | -3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 14.73 | -13.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDA vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and FFRHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.72% | -22.20% | -67.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -1.19% | -19.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.88% | -3.29% | -33.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.34% | -5.90% | -60.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.34% | -22.20% | -44.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.74% | -0.11% | -14.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -1.14% | -34.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.90% | 0.36% | +9.54% |
Volatility
NVDA vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.22%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 0.22% | +11.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.30% | 1.69% | +26.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.41% | 2.34% | +34.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 2.89% | +48.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.95% | 4.13% | +45.82% |
Dividends
NVDA vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison
NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FFRHX's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.39% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to FFRHX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.
FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDA and FFRHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer