PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. BIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. BIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than BIDU's -14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed BIDU with an annualized return of 68.65%, while BIDU has yielded a comparatively lower -3.47% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
-0.97%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
12.01%
6M
13.73%
1Y
45.24%
3Y*
70.46%
5Y*
61.50%
10Y*
68.65%

BIDU

1D
-0.02%
1M
-12.56%
YTD
-14.48%
6M
-10.18%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
-7.08%
5Y*
-9.99%
10Y*
-3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. BIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
12.01%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
-14.48%54.98%-29.20%4.12%-23.13%-31.19%71.08%-20.30%-32.28%42.45%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and BIDU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005

0.37

The correlation between NVDA and BIDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.09T

BIDU:

$38.61B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

BIDU:

CN¥3.78

PE Ratio

NVDA:

31.97

BIDU:

199.95

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.18

BIDU:

9.08

PS Ratio

NVDA:

20.13

BIDU:

2.02

PB Ratio

NVDA:

26.04

BIDU:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

BIDU:

CN¥128.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

BIDU:

CN¥54.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

BIDU:

CN¥23.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. BIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BIDU
BIDU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. BIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDABIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

0.98

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

2.04

+3.23

NVDA vs. BIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the BIDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and BIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. BIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than BIDU's maximum drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and BIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDABIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-77.47%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-34.41%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-50.73%

+13.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-63.13%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-77.47%

+11.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.39%

-67.13%

+55.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-35.59%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.61%

16.52%

-7.91%

Volatility

NVDA vs. BIDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 12.78%, while Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) has a volatility of 13.65%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDABIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.78%

13.65%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.61%

35.61%

-9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.31%

50.63%

-15.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.80%

51.98%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.89%

46.31%

+3.58%

Dividends

NVDA vs. BIDU - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while BIDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. BIDU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Baidu, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
31.88B
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(BIDU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NVDA values in USD, BIDU values in CNY

NVDA vs. BIDU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Baidu, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
38.9%
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

BIDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.41B and revenue of 31.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

BIDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.17B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

BIDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a net income of 3.42B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and BIDU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIDU has higher volatility (13.65%) compared to NVDA (12.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs BIDU's -77.47%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and BIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer