PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. ABEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVDA is traded in USD, while ABEA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ABEA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly lower than ABEA.DE's 18.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed ABEA.DE with an annualized return of 68.59%, while ABEA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 26.69% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
3.54%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
14.05%
6M
20.66%
1Y
49.84%
3Y*
70.84%
5Y*
64.29%
10Y*
68.59%

ABEA.DE

1D
1.86%
1M
-6.41%
YTD
18.93%
6M
20.86%
1Y
111.96%
3Y*
44.43%
5Y*
25.56%
10Y*
26.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
14.05%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
ABEA.DE
Alphabet Inc Class A
18.93%65.55%36.14%59.66%-40.39%66.41%30.23%28.78%-0.40%32.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and ABEA.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.28

The correlation between NVDA and ABEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEA.DE
ABEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ABEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDAABEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.60

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

5.62

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

19.70

-13.81

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the ABEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and ABEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than ABEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -64.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and ABEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAABEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-64.72%

-25.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-19.81%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-30.08%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-43.21%

-23.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-43.21%

-23.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.77%

-7.92%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-14.24%

-21.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

5.66%

+2.82%

Volatility

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE) at 9.47%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAABEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.97%

9.47%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.83%

19.51%

+7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.13%

28.54%

+6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.80%

30.30%

+21.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.87%

27.94%

+21.93%

Dividends

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than ABEA.DE's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEA.DE
Alphabet Inc Class A
0.23%0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. ABEA.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Alphabet Inc Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. NVDA values in USD, ABEA.DE values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and ABEA.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and ABEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer