PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ABEA.DE vs. FNGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ABEA.DE and FNGS is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

ABEA.DE vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.68%
10.54%
ABEA.DE
FNGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABEA.DE:

1.55

FNGS:

2.01

Sortino Ratio

ABEA.DE:

2.18

FNGS:

2.56

Omega Ratio

ABEA.DE:

1.30

FNGS:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

ABEA.DE:

1.90

FNGS:

2.92

Martin Ratio

ABEA.DE:

4.72

FNGS:

9.46

Ulcer Index

ABEA.DE:

9.35%

FNGS:

5.50%

Daily Std Dev

ABEA.DE:

28.39%

FNGS:

25.82%

Max Drawdown

ABEA.DE:

-60.31%

FNGS:

-48.98%

Current Drawdown

ABEA.DE:

-3.06%

FNGS:

-5.35%

Returns By Period


ABEA.DE

YTD

0.00%

1M

14.05%

6M

6.79%

1Y

44.40%

5Y*

24.49%

10Y*

23.43%

FNGS

YTD

0.00%

1M

6.66%

6M

12.85%

1Y

51.99%

5Y*

32.46%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABEA.DE vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABEA.DE, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.242.00
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABEA.DE, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.812.55
The chart of Omega ratio for ABEA.DE, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.251.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABEA.DE, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.582.86
The chart of Martin ratio for ABEA.DE, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.003.879.20
ABEA.DE
FNGS

The current ABEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEA.DE and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.24
2.00
ABEA.DE
FNGS

Dividends

ABEA.DE vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

ABEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM
ABEA.DE
Alphabet Inc Class A
0.30%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
0.00%

Drawdowns

ABEA.DE vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEA.DE and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.85%
-5.35%
ABEA.DE
FNGS

Volatility

ABEA.DE vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc Class A (ABEA.DE) is 7.86%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that ABEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.86%
8.43%
ABEA.DE
FNGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab